Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:38
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
YouTube Will Add an AI Slop Button Thanks to Google’s Veo 3 - Gizmodo
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Which daily habits can help you keep a clear and positive mind?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ask Ethan: What would the Universe be like without dark matter? - Big Think
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Flip 7 leak reveals a few enticing new tidbits - 9to5Google
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
World fertility rates in 'unprecedented decline' - UN - BBC
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Do North Koreans have access to K-Pop?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why was Meghan Markle's Emmy nomination revoked, and how will it impact her Hollywood career?